Search for: "United States v. Holland" Results 181 - 200 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:27 am by WSLL
Day, P.C., of Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
The lion skins and skulls (the “Lion Trophy” or “Lion Trophies,” or “Cargo”) were shipped to the United States for tanning and taxidermy, but at some point were lost in transit. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]