Search for: "United States v. Holland" Results 221 - 240 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2020, 12:05 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In the first major Supreme Court challenge to the Affordable Care Act, NFIB v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:54 pm by Colin O'Keefe
David Donoghue of Holland & Knight on his Chicago IP Litigation Blog Two Market-Based Proposals for Immigration Reform: Cap-and-Trade or Uncap-and-Grow? [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Following growing frustration on the part of the United States and allies concerned with Russia’s seemingly exclusive targeting of non-ISIS enemies of Bashar al Assad’s regime in Syria, Russian airstrikes have finally targeted Islamic State controlled areas. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:19 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5240, is almost certainly on hold for Florida v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission.   [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The British parliament joins the United States Congress, the U.S. administration, the European parliament, and the Council of Europe in declaring the Islamic State’s genocide. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco:  Michael M ____ v.  [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
 The case of Andrew Fitch-Holland, the co-accused in the trial, has been reduced to the status of a “sideshow”, according to his QC, Jonathan Laidlaw. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
Eight days after the Supreme Court had denied review of that question in Melson’s case, the Court agreed to hear nearly the same issue in Holland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Day, P.C., Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Brent R. [read post]