Search for: "United States v. Holland"
Results 321 - 340
of 449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2010, 11:13 pm
The case is Holland USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
The United States has general rights, general powers, and general obligations, not derived from any particular states, nor from all the particular states, taken separately; but resulting from the union of the whole: and, therefore, it is provided, in the fifth article of the confederation, “that for the more convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed to meet in congress. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
At an international meeting, Holland had signed a communiqué stating that cuts of at least 25% to 40% by 2020 were necessary. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The announcement comes a month after China’s anger was provoked by a State Department report claiming that China had been limiting counterterrorism cooperation with the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
In The Intercept, Lee Fang takes issue with Justice Anthony Kennedy’s recent refusal to respond to Fang’s request for a comment on Kennedy’s majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
Last month, writing in the Washington Post, former Foreign Service officer Daniel Hollander penned a short essay, entitled “Forget the Two-State Solution. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
” The court follows Fourth Circuit precedent (United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
(Patently-O) District Court E D Pennsylvania: References to patents in website’s “terms of use” and online product manuals do not constitute false marking: Hollander v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
