Search for: "United States v. Holland"
Results 121 - 140
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:37 pm
Inc. owns a four-unit apartment house in Salisbury. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:32 pm
United States (2014) would confirm or overrule Justice Holmes’s canonical decision in Missouri v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 10:42 am
United States, No. 14-510. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:29 pm
Naseer was indicted by federal authorities in 2010 and extradited from Great Britain to the United States in 2013. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm
” Khamenei also accused the United States of trying to divide Iraq along sectarian lines and urged Iraqis to oppose any such U.S. efforts. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
The case of Andrew Fitch-Holland, the co-accused in the trial, has been reduced to the status of a “sideshow”, according to his QC, Jonathan Laidlaw. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:20 am
Hausman v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The Panopticon blog reports on the argument in the US Supreme Court case of Spokeo Inc v Thomas Robins, a case which concerns the issue as to whether there should be compensation for “digital injury” where there is no financial loss. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
John Bryan, who once dated Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, has launched a legal action against News Corporation in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
Following growing frustration on the part of the United States and allies concerned with Russia’s seemingly exclusive targeting of non-ISIS enemies of Bashar al Assad’s regime in Syria, Russian airstrikes have finally targeted Islamic State controlled areas. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
At an international meeting, Holland had signed a communiqué stating that cuts of at least 25% to 40% by 2020 were necessary. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:51 am
United States [docket; cert petition, PDF] and decide whether the D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:18 am
Circuit misapplied this Court’s Holland decision when it ruled that the Tribe was not entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for filing of Indian Self-Determination Act claims under the Contract Disputes Act? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
United States 14-510Issue: Whether the D.C. [read post]
