Search for: "United States v. Holland" Results 161 - 180 of 369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
It is reported that on 26 March 2014 the police arrested, Andrew Fitch-Holland, who had been a witness for the claimant in the case of Cairns v Modi, on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:10 am by Scott Bomboy
It also heard another significant case in early November about international treaties and the 10th amendment: Bond v. the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am by Jeff Kosseff
Hollander wrote that “absolute certainty is not required. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm by Lisa Kömives
Maryann Cottrell and Richard Holland each appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which granted summary judgment for the Defendant Zagami, LLC. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States, which raises the question of whether a treaty can confer upon Congress the power to enact implementing legislation that would otherwise exceed its enumerated powers. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm by Will Baude
United States, a case about a conviction under a statute that purports to implement a chemical weapons treaty. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Surgidev Corp., 899 P.2d 576, 591 (N.M. 1995) (“evidence of compliance with FDA regulations was properly submitted to the jury for consideration”); United Blood Services v. [read post]