Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 221 - 240 of 858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes famously suggested in 1919 in Schenck v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by Stephen Sachs
Again, nothing in this Article addresses the actual norms of actual legal systems—whether in Blackstone's England, New York State, or the United States as a whole. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by John Jascob
He also subpoenaed two women’s health clinics for medical records, communications among doctors and with third parties, presumably including the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Bemis, Fuller's dance was defined  by the United States Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, Lacombe Circ. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Felix Frankfurter was zealous in guarding Holmes’ reputation after Holmes’ death in 1935 and decided that only the official biographer he anointed in 1939 to carry out the task, Mark Howe of the Harvard Law School, would have access to Holmes’ papers. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm by Brett Trout
Citing both Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act and Urban Dictionary, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) refused Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
WebbBank of the United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by rstokes
Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
United States:   “The door of a court is not barred because the plaintiff has committed a crime. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]