Search for: "United States v. Holmes" Results 161 - 180 of 788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s support for the first eugenics practices (see Buck v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am by Ben
 We covered this story back in July 2013 in our blog Tales From Topical Oceans  Dean had argued that  "the overall look and feel of [the Avatar world] Pandora substantially resembles a Roger Dean world in that Pandora's most striking and memorable features are those created by the Plaintiff"  Now United States District Judge Jesse M. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:51 pm
This is the final stage of the schema, akin to the creation of new superprecedents like United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States, which raises the question of whether a treaty can confer upon Congress the power to enact implementing legislation that would otherwise exceed its enumerated powers. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 655–56 (2009); United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:00 am by Quimbee
The United States Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of these “regulatory takings” in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
The Loving decision came at a pivotal moment in the history of race, gender, law, and marriage in the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:16 am by John Jascob
He also subpoenaed two women’s health clinics for medical records, communications among doctors and with third parties, presumably including the United States. [read post]