Search for: "United States v. Hood" Results 1 - 20 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Hood appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court, with briefs supporting his position filed by dozens of former judges, prosecutors and legal ethics experts. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
Indeed, the state produced overwhelming evidence against Hood in the cold robbery and murder of Ronald Williamson and Tracie Lynn Wallace in Plano. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In each of the five most recent cases, the United States Supreme Court majority has been at pains to emphasize that "well before our decision in Penry I, our cases had firmly established that sentencing juries must be able to give meaningful consideration and effect to all mitigating evidence that might provide a basis for refusing to impose the death penalty[.]" [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm by Oyez Project
United States Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:00 pm by Zachary D Spilman
Army Court of Criminal Appeals, and United States, No. 19-0054/AR (CAAFlog case page), Major Hasan – the Fort Hood shooter and one of four current residents of the military’s death row – asked CAAF to grant him a writ of mandamus ordering all of the judges of the Army CCA to recuse themselves from his case. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 10:00 am by Zachary D Spilman
Div.) brief • Appellant’s reply brief • Blog post: Argument preview Thursday, April 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., at Fort Hood, Killeen, Texas: United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
This case, originally filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on claims of patent infringement, was brought on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]