Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States" Results 301 - 320 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:45 am by Lawrence Solum
However, a closely related question was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Powell v. [read post]
The Alagoas (a Brazilian northeastern state) House of Representatives has recently overruled a governor’s veto to pass the Educational Neutrality Act (ENA) (“Programa Escola Livre”), a law on public education allegedly restrictive of teachers’ rights to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
HR6090, which passed the House of Representatives Wednesday by a 320-91 vote, would provide, in relevant part, For purposes of this Act, the term "definition of antisemitism"— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance], of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the… [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not "Officers of the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 10:24 am by Brady Iandiorio
  The United States Bankruptcy Court in Denver, Colorado, through the Honorable Michael Romero, provided an order regarding plaintiffs’ problems with a home they purchased from an entity controlled or represented by defendants. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:26 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Article further contends that if Congress does exclude a winning candidate on the basis of Section 3, it cannot simply declare the second-place candidate the winner; instead, the election would go to the House of Representatives for a “contingent election. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:24 am
The United States Supreme Court stated in 1990 that the state has "a grave and legitimate interest" in stopping drunk drivers. [read post]