Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States" Results 321 - 340 of 4,665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2020, 10:46 am by Alexis
 Please call your state representative and your state senator, and ask them both to talk to their caucus representatives about making this change permanent. #3 Last week I had my first telehealth appointment! [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm by Paul M. Secunda
Last month I commenced a series of posts of the United States Supreme Court’s labor and employment law decisions last term by blogging on the Court’s decision in the First Amendment public employee free speech case of Lane v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Karl Bayer
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Members of the House of Representatives, referred to as the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (BLAG) intervened as a party defendant to defend DOMA. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution.... ... [read post]
Debate over the United States Constitution didn’t just happen inside the cloistered halls of the Pennsylvania State House in 1787. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am by James P. Flynn
In the year-end holiday rush, employers and other trade secret owners may not have noticed that the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives in mid-December reported favorably on HR 5233, a proposal to create a federal civil cause of action concerning trade secrets. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
In the year-end holiday rush, employers and other trade secret owners may not have noticed that the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives in mid-December reported favorably on HR 5233, a proposal to create a federal civil cause of action concerning trade secrets. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
It is Congress, not the president, that has the power to “provide for the ... general welfare,” “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states,” to appropriate money, and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution” all “powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]