Search for: "United States v. Hudson" Results 241 - 260 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm by Jane Bambauer
A more significant free speech victory for Big Pharma was delivered by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
  For instance, “In-Feed Units” (i.e., “Sponsored By” posts on Facebook) and “Promoted Listings” (i.e., Etsy webpage ads) contain the familiar elements of a print or banner ad: (1) a description of a product, (2) the product manufacturer’s name, and (3) some solicitation to purchase the product or some promotion of the product or brand. [read post]
”[22] While Virginia Pharmacy found that commercial speech is entitled to at least some level of First Amendment protection, the level of judicial review was not articulated until a few years later in the seminal case Central Hudson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-1367 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am by Patrick Maines
But several years before Citizens United, the Court largely nullified a major section of its McCain-Feingold decision when it ruled, in FEC v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am by Larry
United States, may impact the analysis in this case. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court held that the disclosure was “purely factual and non-controversial,” and, unlike the challengers in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The usually easy drive across the Hudson River stopped moving. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]