Search for: "United States v. ICC" Results 181 - 200 of 280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Boris Kasolowsky/Magdalene Steup: “Dallah v Pakistan – Umfang und Grenzen der Kompetenz-Kompetenz von Schiedsgerichten” – the English abstract reads as follows: The UK Supreme Court and the Paris Cour d’appel have recently confirmed, in connection with the ICC arbitration involving Dallah and Pakistan, that the national state courts are not bound by any determinations made by an arbitration tribunal with regard to the existence of a valid… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
These two arbitrators shall appoint by mutual agreement a third arbitrator, the Chairperson, who shall be a national of a third State. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Iraq might then be surprised—even unfairly surprised—to be haled into court in the United States on a judgment against the Ministry under French law. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
Human rights by the 1970s (on what must be accounted a revisionist view to the dominant narrative) represents a retreat to an individualistic ethic of rights against states. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
In 1982, the Ministry filed a claim against Cubic for breach of contract with the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, we hold that confirmation of the ICC’s award is not contrary to the public policy of the United States under Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm by Administrator
  The case, against alleged rebel leaders Abdallah Banda Aadaker Nourain and Saleh Mohammed Jerbo Jamus, is proceeding to trial on the following charges: violence to life, whether committed or attempted, within the meaning of article 8(2)(c)(i) of the Statute; intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a peacekeeping mission within the meaning of article 8(2)(e)(iii) of the Statute; and pillaging within the meaning of… [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US Patents A trio of post-Bilski cases fail to clearly define the meaning of ‘abstract’ (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Google calls on Big Blue again; SEC filing reveals speed of Motorola patent due diligence (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Computer programs and patentable subject matter: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Ferencz, 91, who had served as Chief Prosecutor for the United States in the Einsatzgruppen Case, tried before the post-World War II Nuremberg Military Tribunals (below right). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am by Roshonda Scipio
(RES) TZ 2 SP33 2011 Civil Rights With all deliberate speed : implementing Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
DOHERTY Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF1530.F54 L67 2011 See Catalog Banks and banking, International ICC UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS Paris: ICC Services Pub. ; New York, NY: ICC Books USA, c2006 K1060.8 .I54 2006 See Catalog Bar examinations -- United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
The en banc decision of the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:16 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
A Critique of the Decision on Jurisdiction and Competence in Tza Yap Shum v. [read post]