Search for: "United States v. ICC"
Results 241 - 260
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 am
Very few states have penalized the crime of aggression, but they may begin to do so in the event that the crime of aggression is added to the ICC Statute. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm
Contents include:Yaël Ronen, ICC Jurisdiction over Acts Committed in the Gaza Strip: Article 12(3) of the ICC Statute and Non-state EntitiesShane Darcy, Prosecuting the War Crime of Collective Punishment: Is It Time to Amend the Rome Statute? [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Canada now enjoys a greater degree of economic freedom than the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
In 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided the following arbitration-related cases: In Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 9:33 pm
Eban Ebai, The right to self-determination and the anglophone Cameroon situationOmer Yousif Elagab, Indicting the Sudanese President by the ICC: Resolution 1593 revisitedSonja Grover, Child rape as a crime against humanity: challenging the United States Supreme Court reasoning in Kennedy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
Secretary of State for Defence and Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
Professor Katherine V. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:25 pm
See United States v. von Weizsaecker (The Ministries Case), in 14 Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, at 662 (William S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
This is true even though the crimes of kidnapping and forcible conscription don't share the same elements.The ICC's provisions thus provide more double jeopardy protection than is available in the United States under the Blockburger test, whereby prosecutions are foreclosed only for crimes that share the same elements. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The funds obtained through the enforcement in the relevant EU Member State shall therefore invariably be paid to the relevant State treasury in Germany. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
In an unpublished opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitral tribunal did not exceed its powers and affirmed the confirmation of the arbitral award. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
The United States is not a signatory, and it was Bush himself who instead of ratifying the ICC actually had America’s signature removed. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
The Cases of the United States and the NetherlandsBibi Van Ginkel, Combating International Terrorism: New Powers for the Security Council? [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
