Search for: "United States v. ICC"
Results 21 - 40
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
He saw a United States in turmoil after the January 6th Capitol attack, under former President Donald Trump. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:25 am
The outcome will likely have a lasting impact on the strategic considerations of parties engaged in or contemplating arbitration, reinforcing or reshaping the dynamics of dispute resolution in the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
United States Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
No matter how much authority over all the parameters of railroad competition the ICC was granted—and such authority was considerable[2]—the system of railroad regulation proved susceptible to industry capture and political influence. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo and Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Biden, the Court upheld Roger Severino’s removal from the Council that supervises the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
These doubts were erased, though, by the Supreme Court’s decision in ICC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
” And in 2014, after extensive consultations with ICC States Parties, civil society, academia, and relevant United Nations agencies, the OTP launched its Policy Paper. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
This is one reason that this position, which the United States insisted upon at Rome, was resoundingly rejected during the negotiations. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
In a report that predated the activation of the crime of aggression in 2017 (so that the ICC may exercise jurisdiction in relation to it), one of the rationales that the 7-22 ILC Class gave for precluding the crime of aggression from their Draft Article 7 was that the crime had not been activated for ICC’s jurisdiction, though it was always listed in the Rome Statute. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:02 am
[COMMENT: The Commission issued the SO right before the Epic Games v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 1:32 pm
We will also explore the reluctance of the United States to embrace the ICC as a global institution and the implications of that hesitancy for the legal academy and the Court. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:59 pm
Natalie Orpett sat down with Saraphin Dhanani to discuss United States v. [read post]
