Search for: "United States v. ICC" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 10:57 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells posted the government’s latest en-banc rehearing petition in Al-Bahlul v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am by Daniel Reisner
Forty-one of the 47 state members of the HRC nevertheless voted to accept it; the sole negative vote came from the United States, while the five abstentions came from India, Kenya, Ethiopia, Paraguay and Macedonia. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:58 am by Beth Graham
In his paper, Professor Rau discusses the effect the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in BG Group v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Jurisdictions looking to reform their criminal procedures might also want to see the Model Codes of Post-Conflict Criminal Justice: Model Code of Criminal Procedure (v.2)(United States Institute of Peace (USIP)). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:42 pm by Patricia Wald
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 577 (2005): “It is fair to say that the United States now stands alone in a world that has turned its face against the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
The issue of prisoner disenfranchisement arose in Hirst v. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 11:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted details from a New York Times account of an initial hearing in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Boris Kasolowsky/Magdalene Steup: “Dallah v Pakistan – Umfang und Grenzen der Kompetenz-Kompetenz von Schiedsgerichten” – the English abstract reads as follows: The UK Supreme Court and the Paris Cour d’appel have recently confirmed, in connection with the ICC arbitration involving Dallah and Pakistan, that the national state courts are not bound by any determinations made by an arbitration tribunal with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration agreement… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 7:02 am by Simon Lester
Along the same lines, one could argue that veto powers have been used politically by developing countries leading to the failure of many negotiating rounds – by doing so, they paid no heed to any systematic concern for the WTO as a whole - so why should the United States’ exercise of veto be limited? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 11:00 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The “Foundation” section also surveys how international human rights law treats the dissemination of hate speech, while also making legal comparisons between the domestic law approaches taken by the speech-protective United States, on one extreme, and victim-protective States such as Denmark and the Netherlands, on the other. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Nearly Legal on No admittance : Sharon Horie v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289. [read post]