Search for: "United States v. International Business Machines Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 126
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece on misinformation and how roughly one third of social media users across the United States, as well as Argentina, Germany, South Korea, Spain and United Kingdom, reported seeing false or misleading information about coronavirus. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
International Business Machines Corp., No. 19-5033  (low quality) Huang v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
Irving’s father, Abraham, was self-employed as a hat manufacturer, doing business later as United Headwear Corporation.8 The family had two children, Irving, and his older sister, Gladys. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
McIntyre Machinery employed a distributor to sell its machines in the United States, including New Jersey. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
SEGA of America, Inc., et al., No. 17-1018 Worldwide Oilfield Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
This Article develops that thesis in the context of recent efforts at the public international level to breathe new life into an old machine and suggests the contours of new approaches—a new regulatory machine for new times. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In Europe, the US and Australia 'safe harbour' was being re-examined, with the film studios and recorded music sector finally making some headway against the likes of YouTube and now Facebook in shrinking the 'value gap' that has propelled the technology sector to host some of the biggest businesses in the World. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
When platforms aren’t doing the detective work themselves they are expected to remove users’ posts in response to a corps of ‘trusted flaggers’, sometimes without reviewing the alleged illegality themselves. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
When platforms aren’t doing the detective work themselves they are expected to remove users’ posts in response to a corps of ‘trusted flaggers’, sometimes without reviewing the alleged illegality themselves. [read post]