Search for: "United States v. International Business Machines Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
  The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow:  "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 5:44 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy   THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
" United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 920 So. 2d 21, 24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by John N. Davis
In both the United States and Europe there have also been concerns as to whether the claimed invention was obvious. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP)   United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
When platforms aren’t doing the detective work themselves they are expected to remove users’ posts in response to a corps of ‘trusted flaggers’, sometimes without reviewing the alleged illegality themselves. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Bash, the Chapter 7 Trustee for debtor Ohio Business Machines, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
When platforms aren’t doing the detective work themselves they are expected to remove users’ posts in response to a corps of ‘trusted flaggers’, sometimes without reviewing the alleged illegality themselves. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
Regal-Beloit Corp.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xx] But there’s an internal tension in this description, reflecting a core area of confusion about smart contracts. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Michigan Department of Treasury, 16-697, International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]