Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 81 - 100 of 329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
Co., 96 U.S. 1 (1877), the court held that Congress could regulate telegraph communication as part of its powers to regulate foreign and interstate "commerce. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
  Thus, because they sold unregistered securities through the United States mail or interstate commerce these defendants were liable unless they could prove an exemption. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
Jackson "The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act does not pre-empt state regulation if it is nondiscriminatory and not unreasonably burdensome. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
They may, however, violate the Dormant Commerce Clause, which generally prevents States from “discriminat[ing] against interstate commerce” or “favor[ing] in-state economic interests over out-of- state interests,” if they fail to similarly address out-of-state and domestic products. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  As we reported here on September 18, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that couriers providing deliveries for customers of GrubHub were not involved in interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am by John Stigi and Alejandro Moreno
July 15, 2022) (Jacobs, J.), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit declined to impose “scheme liability” under subsections (a) and (c) of the Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. [read post]