Search for: "United States v. James"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The Case and the Decision After his appointment as City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, James Freed expanded the use of his “public” Facebook page to post about not only personal matters but also about matters related to his public office. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am
Undoubtedly, history as taught to most in the United States has been from a nationalistic and [E]urocentric perspective. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm
In a collective statement, nine civil society organizations, including Access Now and ARTICLE 19, welcome the United States-led UN General Assembly resolution on “safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Donnelley, Corp., 368 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2004) (“materially significant disadvantage”); James v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:05 pm
United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
(Michael Buschbacher and James Conde offer a different take on the Little Tucker Act and 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Unlimited liability was never the norm for bank shareholders or executives in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am
” Attorney James G. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
United States (23-726) and Idaho v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Judge James Ho didn't throw away his shot. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 12. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
United Farm Workers Nat. [read post]
