Search for: "United States v. James" Results 181 - 200 of 5,248
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm by Rick Hasen
Bloomberg BNA: “Challengers of Montana’s ban on corporate spending in state election campaigns will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court “promptly,” seeking to overrule a state court decision that it is in conflict with the high court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am by Aaron L. Nielson
Of course, it was Senator James Buckley — or, as the Supreme Court described him, “a minor-party candidate in 1970 when he was elected to the United States Senate from the State of New York. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:35 am by Wells Bennett
Pohl issued an amended docketing order in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:09 am
The lead majority opinion begins, "Both parties to this case are members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
§ 7, the United States has recently taken the position that classifications based on sexual orientation should be subjected to heightened scrutiny. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by EMMY GIBBS, ATLEU
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:01 pm by H. Scott Leviant
However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]