Search for: "United States v. James" Results 221 - 240 of 5,229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm by NARF
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:04 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Moore v United States, which considers the estent to which the 16th Amendment constrains Congress's ability to impose different sorts of taxes and, in particular, whether Congress may tax unrealized income without apportionment. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 3:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dustin Jansen, The Role of United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 22-800Issue: Whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm by Josh Blackman
And one month later, a cert petition was filed in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]