Search for: "United States v. Jeffers"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
The district court explained that the Paterson lamp was designed and built by the Paterson Institute in the United Kingdom in the early to mid-1990’s and that five articles describing the Paterson lamp were published in the United States, but there was no evidence that the lamp was ever sold, used, or exhibited in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
By Kerry Shapiro, Daniel Quinley and Aaron Boudaie On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
Jeffers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:54 am
In a much anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that, absent a valid assignment agreement, inventors own their invention -- even if federal funding was used to support the research efforts. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm
The post Masimo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Michael Hassen of Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, who publishes the Class Action Defense Blog put up an interesting post last month about a case called Guevarra v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Jeffers said: "We have heretofore explained that '[a] single conspiracy exists, when the conspiracy had the same objective, it had the same goal, the same nature, the same geographic spread, the same results, and the same product.' United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
In an IPR Proceeding With Several Listed Petitioners, The Petitioners Must Speak With A Single Voice
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
District Courts and in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including numerous IPRs currently pending before the PTAB. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
’ State Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
One of the author's partners, Marilyn Barrett -- a former chair of the Taxation Section of the State Bar of California and the Los Angeles County Bar Association and who works in the Tax Department of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro LLP -- assists clients on corporate and partnership tax matters and tax controversy matters, and serves as outside general counsel to mid-market public and privately held companies. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:30 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:18 am
In Salas v. [read post]
