Search for: "United States v. Jeffers"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 2:34 pm
By Kerry Shapiro, Daniel Quinley and Aaron Boudaie On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm
The post Masimo v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:54 pm
With respect to the first opinion, whether method claims can be infringed by a sale or an offer for sale, the district court explained that Chapter 35 of the United States Code, Section 271(a) provides: “Except as otherwise provided in this title, whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term therefor,… [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 11:55 am
California Fish and Game Commission litigation Governor Gavin Newsom’s appointment of a fifth member of the California Fish and Game Commission That Commission’s October 9, 2022 hearing, where consideration of the petition to list the western Joshua tree (WJT) as a threatened species was continued for a second time The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the Bay-Delta longfin smelt on October 7 First, on September 21, 2022, the California… [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
The NWPR was enacted during the Trump administration and represents the EPA’s latest attempt to define the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”). [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
” All Plastic, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
’ State Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:48 pm
Target Corp., 318 F.R.D. 242, 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2016) (quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
SWRCB adopted the Procedures in April 2019 to supplement state-perceived gaps in federal Clean Water Act regulation for proposed discharges of dredged or fill material to broadly defined “waters of the state,” including all wetlands within California – not just wetlands considered “Waters of the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm
The district court explained that the Paterson lamp was designed and built by the Paterson Institute in the United Kingdom in the early to mid-1990’s and that five articles describing the Paterson lamp were published in the United States, but there was no evidence that the lamp was ever sold, used, or exhibited in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
United States, 213 U.S.P.Q. at 940, 1980 WL 39083, at *4 (“The privilege only applies to the communication that takes place between the attorney and the client. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
United States, 213 U.S.P.Q. at 940, 1980 WL 39083, at *4 (“The privilege only applies to the communication that takes place between the attorney and the client. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:31 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
Lavergne, had a duty to disclose material information to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:30 am
In the same paragraph, the Parties defined ‘Territory’ to include the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
Jeffers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:53 am
John Daggy, an undercover officer with IMPD’s vice unit, have just dried up. [read post]
