Search for: "United States v. John Doe, Inc. I" Results 81 - 100 of 1,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 9:31 am by John Lewis
Sterling Jewelers, Inc.pdf., Case No. 10-3247, 2d Cir., 7-1-11, allows a putative class of female retail sales employees to advance their claims of sex discrimination in promotion and pay to arbitration despite the United States Supreme Court decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
” Uncertain scope The bottom-line result of Abitron is that the Lanham Act does not generally cover conduct outside the United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
  While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm by Jarod Bona
Johns River Management District In 2013, the Supreme Court enhanced property rights in the United States when it decided Koontz. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Wendy McGuire Coats
Supreme Court) Judge Noonan exclaimed that he’s read the brief, listened to the argument and simply does not understand the United States’ position. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am by slemberg
ARS National Services, Inc., 09-CV—780 JAH in United States District Court of California. [read post]