Search for: "United States v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 3,888
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm by Corynne McSherry
In the United States, for example, the First Amendment guarantees that platforms generally have the right to decide what content they will host, and their users have a corollary right to receive it. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
Amazon immediately took down Action Care’s product listing page, and 174 units got stranded or lost. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: An assumption that dominates the discourse on race in the United States is that racial subjugation is only harmful to the subjugated. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:09 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
The Minnesota Court of Appeals decided that these types of warrants do not violate the United States and Minnesota constitutions per se, and further found that the warrant at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]