Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 1 - 20 of 3,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2025, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
“Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon “systemic and structural racism” and advanced discriminatory policies and practices. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 4:53 pm
Mooppan, who just left Jones Day, and Sarah M. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
James Poe and Leo Poe have filed this suit against Defendants, whom they allege are "Hamas' close allies in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 6:58 am by Dan Bressler
An actual conflict exists where an attorney has ‘divided and incompatible loyalties within the same matter necessarily preclusive of single-minded advocacy,’ whereas a potential conflict is one that may never be realized (People v Cortez, 22 NY3d 1061, 1068 [2014]). [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 7:59 am by Jonathan Zasloff
Then the statute of limitations would be tolled. 2) This could constitute an “official act” under last year’s absurd precedent of Trump v United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 4:01 am by Administrator
Edwards, the leading authority on the office of the Attorney Gen­eral in the United Kingdom and in the broader Commonwealth, was quite clear in his classic 1964 work The Law Officers of the Crown, and as recently as 1995 in a Canadian essay, that outside their prosecuto­rial decision-making, the Attorney General was and should be liable to professional discipline in the same way as any other lawyer.[10] Even Edwards, however, focused little on this professional accountability of the… [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 3:09 am by SHG
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 707 (1997). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:20 am by Stephen E. Sachs
This temptation is to be resisted, for the United States is not simply one big state. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 00163 (1st Dept., 20925) the Appellate Division held that unless a court states otherwise a voluntary discontinuance is without prejudice and within the court’s discretion (see CPLR 3217[b]; see also Matter of Reid v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 12:06 pm by Rick Garnett
The principle of church autonomy was first recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the post-Civil War case of Watson v. [read post]