Search for: "United States v. Jones"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
Transcripts for today’s arguments in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 5:37 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
Jones, 68 M.J. 465 (C.A.A.F. 2010), and subsequent application in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
Smart Fabricators of Texas, LLC, 970 F.3d 550, a three-judge panel of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal held on August 14, 2020, that seaman status under the Jones Act may apply to an injured welder on a jack-up oil rig adjacent to an inland pier. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:10 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) A report from the front of the line for United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:43 am
The SCOTUS is hearing argument tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
Cir. 2010), in an order styled United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:15 am
Here's the abstract: This article shines light on a little-noticed but important error in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
Audio for Wednesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
But as the Sixth Circuit noted in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 12:51 am
United States as a springboard, this... [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed the case on summary judgment, finding that Ms. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
UNITED STATES V. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
