Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 1 - 20 of 4,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Kennedy, on the other hand, thought the proper test was to determine whether a given water or wetland has a "significant nexus" to waters of the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm by Amy Howe
United States … to adopt a workable standard for delineating the Act’s reach. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:18 am by jonathanturley
The article is entitled “Harm and Hegemony: The Decline of Free Speech in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm by Evan Zoldan
The United States seeks an alternative, broader test proposed in Justice Kennedy’s Rapanos concurrence. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am by JURIST Staff
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am by Michael Stern
Although the PRA declares that “[t]he United States shall receive and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records,” it does not provide all executive officials with unfettered access to such records. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]