Search for: "United States v. Kennedy"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
The post The Sackett Oral Argument and the Problem of Defining "Waters of the United States" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 10:26 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm
Justice Kennedy, on the other hand, thought the proper test was to determine whether a given water or wetland has a "significant nexus" to waters of the United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
United States in 2016. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:21 am
The case, Sackett v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
United States … to adopt a workable standard for delineating the Act’s reach. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:18 am
The article is entitled “Harm and Hegemony: The Decline of Free Speech in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:04 pm
The United States seeks an alternative, broader test proposed in Justice Kennedy’s Rapanos concurrence. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Prior to 2012, when the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Makin and Kennedy v. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
Bruen (Gun rights) Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Joseph Kennedy, the first Chairman of the SEC, had a saying: “No honest business need fear the SEC. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:46 am
Although the PRA declares that “[t]he United States shall receive and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records,” it does not provide all executive officials with unfettered access to such records. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am
Kennedy Human Rights — RFKHR — filed an amicus brief in the case.) [read post]