Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 361 - 380 of 4,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 7:24 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Yes, said all 9 Justices of the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The State of Texas, joined by 25 others states, filed a lawsuit to block this executive action, which affects between 4 and 5 million immigrants in the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
And while he seems more open to embracing a positive vision of race and thinking about the state's inevitable role in constructing identity, his vision may also be more tied to context and less generalizable across cases.In my view, the story of Kennedy's opinion in the desegregation cases began not with Bakke or Grutter, but with a voting-rights decision issued last year in a case called League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 Last week, a unanimous Supreme Court of the United States agreed that the appointments at issue were invalid. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am by Katherine McCoy
In contrast, in a concurring opinion, Justice Kennedy concluded that “waters of the United States” includes wetlands with a “significant nexus” to traditional navigable waters. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am by Holly
January 5, 2023  |  By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:02 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]