Search for: "United States v. Kessler" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2018, 12:26 pm by Austin Mehr
Peterson also served as Law Clerk to United States District Court Judge Gregory F. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
  The case concerns the President’s authority to detain individuals lawfully within the United States without trial on suspicion of conspiracy to engage in terrorism. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
Approval of drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not preempt any liability under state tort laws for pharmaceutical manufacturers, editors of the New England Journal of Medicine argue in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am by Jane Chong
” Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm by Ilya Somin
In so doing, however, she simply ignores the main arguments against the federal government’s position under that Clause: that the mandate is not “proper” even if “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five factor test recently applied by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am by Lauren Bateman
 In any event, argues the United States, habeas is an inappropriate mechanism for attacking such conditions. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:42 pm by Benjamin Wittes
L. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), held that the “United State’s authority to detain an enemy combatant is not dependent on whether an individual would be a threat to the United States or its allies if released but rather upon the continuation of hostilities. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court has already decided its one other patent-focused case for the term–United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 10:40 am by Ellis Cose
He had learned that many demographers thought whites would eventually become a minority race in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Jim Martin
Professor Kessler stated that some of the attorneys in the Department of Justice did attempt to mitigate the crackdown on civil liberties, but their actions were generally ineffectual because local Unite States attorneys could decide how to prosecute sedition cases. [read post]