Search for: "United States v. King" Results 241 - 260 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2010, 7:49 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Cases that were scheduled for the conference but are on neither list have likely been "relisted" for a second look at a later conference.Also granted is the Solicitor General's petition in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:39 am
I've added a statement on the case from The Owners' Rights Initiative, about the Supreme Court ruling that even books purchased outside the United States are subject to the 'First Sale Doctrine' as long as they are legally purchased (piracy is still a no-no), and brought into the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
In the British system, "all the king's subjects" could be impeached, including private citizens. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:51 am by zshapiro
Notes:The United State Department of Justice joined Kentucky and filed an amicus brief ? [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
Vernon, Florida, subject of a famous documentary by Errol Morris, is the subject of coverage here (“By the end of the ’50s, the Florida Panhandle was responsible for two-thirds of all loss-of-limb accident claims in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:23 am
 On June 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court held in King v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:13 pm by NARF
United States (Indian Health Service; Contract Support Costs) Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
  Maybe not a massive amount, since Mexican troops have never really invaded the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:58 am by Ronald Mann
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company will never get the press scrutiny of King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
Now that I’m back on Ohio, here are some additional thoughts and observations about today’s oral argument in King v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Static Control Components and United States v. [read post]