Search for: "United States v. King" Results 141 - 160 of 2,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
Following World War II, the United Nations was formed to promote international cooperation, and in 1948, it drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the first global ex [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:41 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court in Kentuckly v, King, Docket No.09-1272, held that warrantless searches are valid so long as a police officer knocks loudly, announces themselves and hears evidence being destroyed. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:46 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, the litigation concerns the environmental fate of New Mexico's Otero Mesa, the largest publicly-owned expanse of undisturbed Chihuahuan Desert grassland in the United States (over 1.2 million acres). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:04 pm
Abigail Moncrieff, author of an important amicus brief on federalism issues in King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm by cdw
From the intro: Leading off this week are two stays from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
King, where the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling that will have major implications on searches and seizures. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
As reported by a local Vermont paper, there is an interesting development going on in a federal capital case in Vermont, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by hvwlawyers
On June 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court made headlines by ruling on King v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 1:31 pm
When an educational institution provides consumer credit, it becomes a nondischargeable student loan, or so it appears from a recent decision in United States Bankruptcy Court (McKay v Vanderbilt University, Adversary no. 07-3182-tmb) affirmed by US District Judge Garr King in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm by Jeffrey P. Hermes
  However, this is the first such suit filed in a United States court, raising the question of whether the suit could succeed under the laws of California and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]