Search for: "United States v. Kirby" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It is about whether Kirby’s work qualifies as work-for-hire under the Copyright Act of 1909, as interpreted by the courts, notably the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Sack, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with Walt Disney Co. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In reversing the Southern District, the Second Circuit held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm by Robert L. Abell
The Court held that Supreme Court precedent, Kirby v.Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sometimes this is an easy question, other times, slightly more complex. in MCCORD -v.- O'NEILL,; No. 08-3096-cv ; Summary Order; UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT;2010 U.S. [read post]