Search for: "United States v. Kirby" Results 81 - 100 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2016, 5:09 am by Elena Chachko
If the 2012 ICJ decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
United States Envt’l Protection Agency, 4 F.Supp.2d 435 (M.D.N.C. 1998), vacated by, 313 F.3d 852 (4th Cir. 2002) Tocolytics – Medical Malpractice Hurd v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
HART, CPA; and MOORE & HART, CPA, 6:09-CV-920;UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
The Casebook also includes court decisions from Canada: Haig v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Bloomberg TV has an explainer on Kirby v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am by Zack Bluestone, Chris Mirasola
However, State Department spokesman John Kirby asserted that there is “nothing offensive or provocative” about these new troop deployments. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:49 am
Supp. 2d 302, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (citing United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:59 am by Taryn Rucinski
Environmental and health regulation in the United States and the European Union : protecting public and planet / Mitchell P. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm by Adam Wagner
We posted: It is unsurprising, therefore, that more questions are being asked as to whether our judges are properly qualified to understand and rule on such controversial areas, even to the extent of looking more closely at their religious beliefs; something which is common in relation to the United States Supreme Court but until now has been unusual in the UK. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the… [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 517 F.3d 1319, 1339 n.22 & 1344 (Fed. [read post]