Search for: "United States v. Knotts"
Results 41 - 60
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The technology was, in this context, not unconvincingly analogized by the Court to a searchlight, a marine glass, or a field glass (id. at 283, citing United States v Lee, 274 US 559, 563 [1927]). [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Krull , 480 U.S. 340 (1987) (police conducted a search in reasonable reliance on subsequently invalidated state statutes); Arizona v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
Jones (formerly United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
Jones (formerly United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(Orin Kerr) This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
(Orin Kerr) According to this morning’s order list, the Supreme Court has agreed to review United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
Nor can a defendant expect privacy as to the location of his or her vehicle on public streets (see United States v Knotts, 460 U.S. 276, 281-282 [1983]; People v Edney, 201 AD2d 498, 499 [1994], lv denied 83 NY2d 910 [1994]). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]