Search for: "United States v. Larkin"
Results 21 - 40
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
This list includes (among others) (i) publicly traded companies, (ii) 501(c) tax exempt entities under the Internal Revenue Code, (iii) certain pooled investment vehicles, (iv) any entity that (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States, (b) filed in the previous year's federal income tax returns more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales in the aggregate (including the receipts or sales of other entities owned by the entity and other… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
For much of the movement, it’s not just that church and state should be tight partners but also that the United States is and should be a Christian country. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Larkin v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm
See, Larkin Jr, Paul J. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 2:29 am
Henry, Montclair State University. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984); see also the later case of Murray v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
See, United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
He was the author of the INTA amicus curiae brief to the United States Supreme Court in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
United States, 494 U.S. 152, 158 (1990). [read post]
