Search for: "United States v. Larkin" Results 81 - 100 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Gunderson, 279 S.W.3d 93, 109-110, 112 (Ky. 2008); Larkin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
Section 861 states that certain `items of gross income shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.... [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Notwithstanding a quintet of relists since receiving the record, the Court denied cert. without comment in Larkin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Indeed, he argues, the government presented no evidence of Hatim’s conduct that post-dated October of 2001, when the United States got involved in Afghanistan, or even September 11. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am by Bexis
  The underlying rationale for the validity of the learned intermediary doctrine remains just as viable today as stated by Judge Wisdom in 1974 [citations, inclulding block quote from Reyes v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Vanderloo, 386 N.W.2d 108, 116 (Iowa 1986).Kentucky: Larkin v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
:  the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]