Search for: "United States v. Larkin"
Results 81 - 100
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Gunderson, 279 S.W.3d 93, 109-110, 112 (Ky. 2008); Larkin v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:24 am
Kohler Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:05 am
Two recent decisions, one in a Federal court applying the Federal Daubert standard and one is New York state court applying the Frye general acceptance test, rejected expert testimony based on the results of fMRI scanning.In finding fMRI failed to satisfy the exacting standard of Federal Rule of Evidence 702, a Federal magistrate judge in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm
United States, [644 F. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
United States, 14-419. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:04 am
See, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Background: Turning back to the lawsuit, Larkin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
There is a fervent debate in the United States between proponents of gun rights, such as Applicant, and proponents of limitations on those rights. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
Section 861 states that certain `items of gross income shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.... [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
Notwithstanding a quintet of relists since receiving the record, the Court denied cert. without comment in Larkin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:14 pm
Indeed, he argues, the government presented no evidence of Hatim’s conduct that post-dated October of 2001, when the United States got involved in Afghanistan, or even September 11. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am
The underlying rationale for the validity of the learned intermediary doctrine remains just as viable today as stated by Judge Wisdom in 1974 [citations, inclulding block quote from Reyes v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Vanderloo, 386 N.W.2d 108, 116 (Iowa 1986).Kentucky: Larkin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
