Search for: "United States v. Leatherman" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2013, 10:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(quoting United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:35 am
S. 506, 515 (2002) (quoting Leatherman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court’s decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir.1972). [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am by Sean Wajert
Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir.1972). [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:45 am by Jason Rantanen
” Slip Op. at 9, quoting Leatherman Tool Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
ACSblog also covers a speech by Senator Sherrod Brown at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law in which the Senator criticized the Court’s January decision in Citizens United. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Sean Wajert
 Here, plaintiffs acknowledged that, based on the volume of product sold, every adult in the United States is a potential class member. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., as courts in at least seven states (including the court below) hold; or, instead, (2) use the rational-factfinder test of Jackson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:11 am by Sean Wajert
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 639 F.3d 942 , 947 (9th Cir. 2011)); see also Negrete v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
   The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
The contents of the reference and the meaning of the claim are irrelevant in a procedural challenge.If the examiner failed to address a claim limitation (as is the norm in the 3690s business methods art units) or neglected an element of the prima facie case set forth in MPEP Chapter 2100, then an appeal brief meets its legal burden by simply pointing out the procedural failure. [read post]