Search for: "United States v. Lefkowitz" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2007, 6:20 am
On June 28, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued it decision in Lefkowitz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The subject is preemption – specifically the the United States Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:18 am
" For example, she described a 1929 decision, Fisher v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Lefkowitz & Steven Menashi, Brief of Amici Curiae Former Justice Department Officials in Support of Petitioners in Zubik v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:12 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 261 (patent holder “may … grant and convey an exclusive right under his application for patent, or patents, to the whole or any specified part of the United States”). [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A court’s review of a PERB's decision is limited to determining if it was affected by an error of law or it was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretionKent v Lefkowitz, 2016 NY Slip Op 03650, Court of Appeals In response to New York State Racing and Wagering Board* (the Racing Board) reducing per diem wages for its seasonal employees* by 25%, the Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO [PEF], the certified collective bargaining representative for the… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
" [Motion to appeal denied, 93 N.Y.2d 803.]Howevere, in the event an individual fails to answer questions truthfully where he or she has use or transactional immunity, such immunity does not prevent any false answer the individual might give the investigator from being used against the individual if he or she is subsequently charged with perjury [United States v Apfelbaum, 445 US 115].The Ali decision is posted on the Internet at:[] [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
” [Seabrook v Johnston, 660 NY2d 311, United States v Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115]. [read post]