Search for: "United States v. Leon" Results 1 - 20 of 534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Wells Bennett
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Irina Tarsis
This year, the Supreme Court of the United States may (or may not) grant a writ to hear a case involving Nazi-era looted art for the first time in almost a decade. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Orin Kerr
According to Judge Leon, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:30 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Thomas Ashton Leon DeBauche has posted Bursting Bottles: Doubting the Objective-Only Approach to 18 U.S.C. 875(C) in Light of United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by Julia Zebley
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, noted that the bar set in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Sarah Grant
Al-Alwi previously filed a habeas petition in 2005, which Judge Leon took up following the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Dec 2012, 7:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner cited to Articles 414 and 415 of the Civil Code of the Mexican State of Nuevo Leon: Article 414. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 7:10 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The government relies, as it did in the court below (and as the district court did), on the 1949 case of United States v. [read post]