Search for: "United States v. Lester" Results 21 - 40 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
The Corps’ Definition of Waters of the United States From Clark Morrison: Justice Scalia’s passing may have an immediate impact on the Army Corps of Engineers’ expanded definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm by Joel R. Brandes
On July 19, 2022, Respondent and the minor child traveled from Canada to the United States, specifically Frisco, Texas, in the Eastern District of Texas, to visit extended family, with the expectation that both the minor child and Respondent would return to Canada on September 7, 2022. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:55 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Benton Foundation – Andrew Jay Schwartzman, June 21, 2017: “On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States used an unlikely vehicle to expand the scope of First Amendment protection for Internet users. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:04 pm
This case represents another example where the guidelines in a securities-fraud prosecution "have so run amok that they are patently absurd on their face," United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Congress, having referred to the first amendment and stated that it is “necessary to promote the vigorous dialogue necessary to shape public policy in a representative democracy” went on to note that: “some persons are obstructing the free expression rights of United States authors and publishers, and in turn chilling the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States interest of the citizenry in receiving information on… [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 8:51 pm
Barnum, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance in the United States: UpdateAchilleas Demetriades, Silvia Bartolini, & Theodora Christodoulidou, Life Imprisonment as Inhuman and Degrading Treatment: Kafkaris v Cyprus before the European Court of Human Rights [read post]