Search for: "United States v. Levy"
Results 201 - 220
of 952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am
With respect to cigarettes, in particular, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Rubin et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
United States and Town of Vernon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
United States (1935) is the foundational case upon which independent agencies were created. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 1:04 am
The IRS Collections Unit Threatens a Tax Levy In Budish, the taxpayer owed $205,000 in back taxes. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:03 pm
It royalty is classified as a tax, prior decisions have held that State legislatures lacked competence to levy taxes on mineral rights as they were dealt with under Entry 54, List I, VII Schedule, where Union had the exclusive competence. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
The case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
19 May 2014, 5:00 am
The United States District Court held that the ordinance was a fee for the purposes of the TIA. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
United States (Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA) taxes)United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am
And, in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:45 pm
Nalwa v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
§ 292 and get half of any fines levied against the entity responsible for the false marking. (4) The other half of the fine goes to the United States government. (5) While § 292 only provides for a civil monetary fine, the fine is up to $500 per offense. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
But, partly because the Clause has not yet been incorporated against the states, many states and cities are indeed levying excessive fines and forfeitures. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
On February 13, Akin Gump filed this Respondent’s brief in US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
On the federal level, the United States Supreme Court has held that a valid disclaimer does not defeat a federal tax lien levied under IRC § 6321, Dyre, Jr. v. [read post]
