Search for: "United States v. Levy" Results 81 - 100 of 933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am by Jon
The power to punish conspiracy cannot be included with the class of incidental or resulting powers. ... the people of the United States, by declaring that treason should consist only in levying war. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:42 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Wednesday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:43 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Tuesday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:04 am by garcia@sacramentolawgroup.com
In one case, the Court held that federal tax lien has priority over the simultaneous state and private liens (United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 7:40 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
No. 041/2016 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law New Memorandum Elaborates U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 2:00 am by NCC Staff
 United States a unanimous Court said that the Civil War income tax was constitutional. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Frohen, Common Good Constitutionalism and the Problem of Administrative Absolutism, (April 14, 2022).Jennifer Lee Koh, Race, Immigration Law, and Christianity: Reflections and Tensions Raised by United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States (07-513), on whether courts must suppress evidence seized during an arrest made as a result of faulty information provided by another law enforcement agency. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
They want the United States Supreme Court to take up again the constitutionality of using the death penalty in that way.They expect that if it does so, the Court will overturn its 2008 Kennedy v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am by Andrew Hamm
United States claim because, as an unauthorized alien, he is without any legal right to remain in the United States; and (2) whether the Arizona Supreme Court erred in finding Strickland prejudice, where inter alia there was no evidence that the respondent had a viable defense either to the criminal charges or deportation. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]