Search for: "United States v. Line Material Co"
Results 61 - 80
of 951
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
For example, it is inappropriate to ignore negotiated reductions to the final price.[25] But the contractor must establish that the negotiated reduction related to the same cost element as the undisclosed data.[26] The proposed price also is not the appropriate baseline where there have been material changes, such as new quantities or delivery schedules.[27] Additionally, the proposal price is not the appropriate baseline where there is evidence the Government relied on another analysis or… [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
After the oral arguments in Twitter v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Cohen as income to the New York State tax authorities. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Questionnaires should require information on whether the nominee is an employee, officer, partner or co-investor of the nominating stockholder. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
§ 841 as it crosses the Texas state line at some point and enters into the federal jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
" I began to learn that hard lesson when I was a young lawyer at the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:35 am
Monster Energy Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
United States, 140 S. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
District Court in TikTok Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:55 am
Vilsack and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
If anyone notes an error or inconsistency in this time line, please let me know, provide better sources, and ask for a correction. [read post]
