Search for: "United States v. Long" Results 81 - 100 of 17,749
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
This law essentially provides for the admission of recorded conversations as long as at least one party consented to the recording, unless the party making the recording acts with a purpose to violate state law or to commit a tortious act. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
This week's FedWeek "Armed Forces News" email newsletter notes upcoming changes to the privacy notice on government computers, apparently prompted by the decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:43 am by John Rich and Beth L. Fowler
In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota  v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:47 am
In a ruling that could endanger long-standing union practices, the United States Supreme Court determined that public employees cannot be required to join unions or pay dues in Harris v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am by Ashley Deeks
 However, given how long Sweden’s request for Assange has been pending with the UK, and given that the UK courts already have deemed him eligible for surrender, it is no surprise that the UK has hinted that it would prioritize the Swedish request over one from the United States. [read post]