Search for: "United States v. Lopez" Results 61 - 80 of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 10:26 am by basslaw
When legal scholars consider instances over the past 25 years in which the Supreme Court has struck down federal legislation as unconstitutional, two cases come up most frequently: United States v Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:26 am by basslaw
When legal scholars consider instances over the past 25 years in which the Supreme Court has struck down federal legislation as unconstitutional, two cases come up most frequently: United States v Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), and United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
 And so the Fifth Circuit struck the GFSZA down.The Fifth Circuit’s opinion was subsequently vindicated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 4:24 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas denied both the plaintiff's and the defendant's motions for summary judgment in Lopez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 11:50 am
  Including but not limited to his BLM-issued Sig Sauer P239, which was in a backpack in the vehicle.Four days later, Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez was sitting on a bench nearby and found Woychowski’s pistol, wrapped in a shirt or rag, near where he was sitting. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:05 pm
Defendant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine for sale and sentenced to 25 years to life in 1998.Since 1998, defendant has spent most of his time in the Secured Housing Unit (SHU) at Pelican Bay State Prison due to his involvement in the Northern Structure prison gang. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm
In a case of great technological interest, on February 29, 2012, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Lopez-Islava 15-1496 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b), as incorporated into the Immigration and Nationality Act’s provisions governing an alien’s removal from the United States, is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]