Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 201 - 220 of 968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The bill broke with tradition in Britain and the empire, as it included provisions from the bill of rights of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:27 pm by Kevin
Members of the House & Senate of the United States, 2012 WL 5430962 (M.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:26 am by Jani
In the United States, under various State legislation, an individual's personality or persona can be protected; something that isn't protectable per say under UK legislation.Some faces are just made for t-shirtsNevertheless, the protection offered under passing off can potentially extend to individuals, at least on a prima facie application of the requisite elements: there has to be goodwill associated with that individual; a misrepresentation as to that goodwill… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Photo Credit: United States Marshal’s Service [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:40 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Schedule 6 applies the provisions of the Maintenance Regulation to the allocation of jurisdiction for intra-state cases within the United Kingdom relating to maintenance. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
God and the Illegal Alien, United States Immigration Law and a Theology of Politics by Robert W. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am by Jani
One can easily agree with Lord Justice Buxton, and as he further states, 'use' should entail a more active component than just passively placing in in a sphere where it is easily accessed from, even by accident. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Rix, Lloyd and Wilson) gave its ruling in Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 753.At issue in this dispute was the shape of Whirlpool's retro-looking KitchenAid Artisan mixer and its rival, Kenwood's kMix. [read post]