Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
She argued that Article 8 imposed on the State a positive obligation to facilitate the gypsy way of life (Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, BAILII: [2001] ECHR 43, ECHR 2001 I and Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, BAILII: [2004] ECHR 223, 27 May 2004) and in granting such a wide-ranging injunction the authorities were acting in violation of this obligation. 21. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:01 am
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-fourth. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
” Lord Reed noted dicta in Ahmad v United Kingdom (App nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 & 67354/09) to the effect that segregation for security, disciplinary or protection reasons does not per se violate Article 3. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011) – Read decision Potential future US president Donald Trump once said that “Everything in life is luck“. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:31 am
Do recent changes to Schedule 7 powers make Beghal v United Kingdom moot? [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:49 am
Apple FRAND contract trial (no patent infringement questions in that case) in the Eastern District of Texas (that case is now at the summary judgment stage) (Presiding Judge: the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Rodney Gilstrap); andon December 21, an Ericsson v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Sales reject this. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
United States A Derry priest has been granted permission to sue an American Catholic Diocese for defamation. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
