Search for: "United States v. Lord"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:57 am
(R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ¶ 77, supra.). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Research and Resources Libel actions – here or the United States? [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
His petition says that he "is the only person in the United States who is on death row for a non-homicide offense. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:23 am
United States and Dean Mazzone's article that I linked to yesterday. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The officers had been involved in executing the arrest of Babar Ahmed (who was subsequently convicted of terrorism offences and served a sentence in the United States) at Mr Ahmed’s home in December 2003. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
But it's also a reminder to not expect too much of United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
” Lord Reed stated that s 101(2) could not have been intended to enable the courts to rewrite provisions which were, on their face, unambiguously outside legislative competence. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
Article 13 The domestic proceedings in this case culminated in the judgment given by the House of Lords in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust and Ors [2005] 2 AC 373. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
By a 3:2 majority expressed “entirely obiter” (Brownlie II, at [45]) the Court had answered affirmatively: [48]-[55] (Baroness Hale), [56] (Lord Wilson) & [68]-[69] (Lord Clarke). [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:14 am
For those of you who are interested in the case Monasky v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
"Huawei's counsel didn't have an immediate answer, but promised to check.In the United States, the court would have requested the views of the Solicitor General of the United States ("CVSG"). [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
People in the United Kingdom cannot receive PCCM's closed circuit service. [read post]
